Chantell Van Erbe - Fantasized Realism in Fine Art

 
CPSA FYIs 01/29/2009
 

The prospectus for CPSA's 17th Annual Juried Exhibition in Atlanta, Georgia has been sitting on my desk for several weeks now. I've been eyeing it up and down. A bit gun-shy on whether or not I'll enter this year.

You see, I was accepted into last year's show and was very excited about it. I purchased a pricey Airfloat box, shipped my painting out to Seattle, WA - only for it to be disqualified on site. Then at my expense, of course, I had to arrange for its immediate return. Yeah, that stung a bit.

Turns out CPSA and I have different opinions on what constitutes an ornate frame. They prefer a more uniform and simplistic exhibition appearance. Which means no frames that are over-the-top. The funny part? I thought my framing choice was quite tame (see images 1 & 2 below)..well compared to what I usually have wrapped 'round my work (see images 3 & 4 below).

 I could go on forever regarding the importance of framing and how it virtually enhances the character of a work of art. A painting and frame are like PB&J (without the salmonella). Nevertheless, rules are rules.

I guess I'd like to give this whole thing another shot. But I had other questions. Before I even dared getting back on the proverbial horse, I wanted answers. Solid proof - that if I entered a painting or two this year and with some luck did get accepted, that my piece wouldn't take a long trip to GA, hang out for 30 mins only to be examined, rejected on some loophole bylaw that I missed and sent back on its merry way home. Phew! If I were the painting, I'd slap me really hard. I needed to get more acquainted with CPSA's standards. Hence, I sent an e-mail to their National President, Kay Schmidt:

"Dear Ms. Schmidt, I'm looking forward to entering this year's CPSA 17th Annual show in Atlanta. But before I do, I have a few questions to run by you regarding my work and the drawing(s) that I'd like to submit.

#1) Aside from CP's, the finishing touches of my works are occasionally rendered in watercolor pencils. Is this acceptable?
#2) The piece is framed without matting. Is this acceptable?
#3) The piece was done on an Ampersand clay board. It was commercially manufactured by the company and purchased from an art supply store. I did not gesso/prepare the ground. Is this acceptable?


I was disqualified from last year's exhibition due to a frame that was too ornate. So you can understand why I want to be extra careful. I hope you are well and enjoying the new year.
"

  To the point (pun intended), right? I must say that Kay Schmidt couldn't have responded any quicker. She was extremely helpful- even going as far as forwarding my query to Exhibition Director, Paula Parks. Her answer to all three questions was yes. Water-soluble colored pencils are legal for all CPSA shows; matting is not required, and you may use any manufactured 2-D surface. BTW the size limitation is 32 x 40" framed. A tad small for my taste but not bad.

So if you weren't aware of these regulations, then you've learned something new. If you did know, then why didn't you tell me? I'd like to wish all potential participants good luck! Hopefully you're wishing me the same - that is, if I decide to enter ;-)


 


Comments

kendra ferreira

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:52:28

Well, I am surprised that your frame was rejected last year. I don't think its too "ornate". The frame, mat and that little gold rim (called liner lip?? not sure) compliment the piece really nicely. I am surprised it was not accepted. Better luck this year! Glad Kay answered your questions. I think its great that you think 32x40 is a bit small!! Think BIG!

 

Chantell

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:40:59

Kendra,

I was surprised about the frame, myself and also annoyed. I agree about the frame matching the subject. But I'll just have to scale down my framing choices when it comes to CPSA.
I always call that insert inside the frame the lip too.
And yes, I'm much more comfortable painting in larger scale. Thanks for your encouragement!

 

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:11:51

Hi Chantell,

Sorry to hear your frame got rejected. It really didn't look that decorative. I hope you try it again. You will get in. Your work is awesome. One of these days I may join the cpsa and enter one of their shows. Not really crazy about my artwork traveling without me though. I always drive or fly with it.
Scott

 

Chantell

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:33:03

Thank you, Scott. You're very kind. My sentiments exactly regarding the frame. C'est la vie. It's water under the bridge now.
I hate shipping my work out too and usually drive with it in tow. But sometimes it is in our best interests, as artists, to send the work off and make a name for itself, no?

 

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:56:22

Hi Chantell,
I noticed you had been accepted to last year's show but your piece was not on display. That is too bad about the frame. I was very worried that my frame would be rejected when it got there, but it wasn't. It's less ornate than yours, but they are pretty strict about the frames. Most frames were very simple wood or metal, which in my opinion is a drab and unappealing frame for a piece one spends months on and labors over. Economics aside, (which is an excellent reason for going with metal) most fine art looks better with a nice wooden frame.

You should definitely submit again this year. If you get in, please go to Atlanta! It would be great to see you there. I will probably go even if I don't get in.

Stay warm. I'm looking forward to seeing what you're working on, when it's time to show!

Debbi

 

Chantell

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:17:46

You are my MY best cheerleader, Debbi. Ok, I'll give it another shot. Getting this piece framed is going to kill me. I'll probably get it framed if I get accepted. Why bother wasting my $ on a plain frame if I don't get in. I'd love to see what your frame looked like. Maybe you could e-mail me a photo if it's not too much trouble? I need to see what they consider acceptable.
And I might even consider going to Atlanta too!

 

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:32:36

I will definitely email you a photo of my frame later. I can't believe I've wasted the morning away and not gotten up to my studio yet! Actually, yes I can. Am I really your best cheerleader? That is so sweet of you!

 

Chantell

Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:53:17

Thank you for the photos, Debbi. They definitely helped. And yes you are a terrific cheerleader!

 

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply


© Chantell Van Erbe' - Fantasized Realism 1991 - 2009. All rights reserved.